Link post
Part I lists and analyzes the cases I identified, then lists several conclusions I was able to draw from my case studies. Those conclusions are:
-
National security considerations have entered the antitrust enforcement process numerous times over the past 100 years.
-
It is rare for the USG to actively use antitrust enforcement to advance unrelated national security objectives.
-
In cases where national security and economic considerations conflict, economics has been given more weight over time.
-
The president plays an important role in reconciling conflicting considerations.
Part II discusses how these conclusions might apply to AI firms in the coming decades.