Rapid Increase of Highly Mutated B.1.1.529 Strain in South Africa

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aShg5mryzKuyPCur2/rapid-increase-of-highly-mutated-b-1-1-529-strain-in-south

I’m sorry to ruin your holidays. The video above is my only source for this information. I will summarize the key findings here. A cluster of cases among students in Gauteng was recently sequenced. A new variant, B.1.1.529 was found. The mutation profile of this variant looks horrendous: Mutation Profile of B.1.1.529Each of the vertical black lines is a mutation from the original strain. For comparison, here is what the Delta variant looks like: Mutation Profile of B.1.617 (Delta)Some of these mutations have known phenotypic impact (effect on transmissiblity and immune evasion), while others are brand new. As you may be quick to point out, more mutations does not equal bad. However, the proportion of sequenced cases comprised of this new variant is rapidly rising: Viral Proportions in South AfricaOne might be tempted to say that this just the founder effect from the new cluster in Gauteng. However, while there has not been much full sequencing in other provinces, we can see that the lack of the "S-gene" in PCR tests, which the authors here are using as a signal that an infection may have been caused by this variant, is in fact rising rapidly in most provinces of South Africa. Given that this is the most mutated strain of the coronavirus yet, we may be in for a rough time. The C.1.2 variant, seen in the image "Variant proportions in South Africa" above, was the strain with the most mutations until recently. C.1.2 never really took off the way that B.1.1.529 is taking off, though. I expect that we will be hearing about this variant more. I think there is strong reason to believe that the high number of mutations in the spike protein will have a very negative impact on vaccine efficacy against this variant.

Comment

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aShg5mryzKuyPCur2/rapid-increase-of-highly-mutated-b-1-1-529-strain-in-south?commentId=8c4NmpyMCgM2nHBC2

Here are the slides for the video: sars-cov-2-sequencing-new-variant-update-25-november-2021

Comment

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aShg5mryzKuyPCur2/rapid-increase-of-highly-mutated-b-1-1-529-strain-in-south?commentId=ozsMusR7t2DdTuvhn

Thanks for this! Updated the post with more high quality screenshots.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aShg5mryzKuyPCur2/rapid-increase-of-highly-mutated-b-1-1-529-strain-in-south?commentId=PwoKsbtJSf4rSWo4a

Thanks for this. This tweet from Dr. Jacob Glanville, founder and CEO of Centivax, makes me worried about this variant too:

The new B.1.1.529 strain out of South Africa has 15 mutations in the RBD where majority of neutralizing antibodies bind. The current vaccines and even Delta-based vaccines probably won’t work against this new strain. Swift, vigorous containment is needed.

Comment

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aShg5mryzKuyPCur2/rapid-increase-of-highly-mutated-b-1-1-529-strain-in-south?commentId=LqDKpeuRJTdqGqXBv

And this thread from Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding is worrying too.

Comment

This screenshot from that thread claims that the new variant was ~89% of cases ~18 days after it was 1% of cases, meaning it went from a ratio of ~1:100 to ~810:100. If both delta and this new strain has a generation time of 4.6 days (first result from google for delta), that would indicate that it’s R-value is the (18/​4.6)th root of 810 ~= 5.5 times higher than delta’s. (But some of that change could be explained by a shorter generation time.) (Edited numbers in response to jimv’s comment.)

Comment

it went from a ratio of ~1:100 to ~890:100 I think ~89% is more like 810:100. Not that that changes the general message, and there’s no doubt a fair amount of uncertainty in the percentage anyway.

Comment

You’re right, that makes it ~5.5.

This is a pretty strong indication of immune escape to me, if it persists in other outbreaks. If this was purely from increased infectiousness in naive individuals it would imply an R-value (in non-immune populations) of like 40 or something, which seems much less plausible than immune escape. I don’t know what the vaccination/​infection rates are in these communities though.

Comment

Quick googling, numbers for south africa:

  • Population 59 million.

  • 28% of population at least one dose, 24% fully vaccinated.

  • 89,771 deaths. At 0.5% fatality rate that would be 18 million people ~= 30% of the population. So maybe 100% immune escape would be a factor 1.5-3? Leaving at least a factor 2-3 for generally increased infectiousness. (Assuming unchanged generation length.)

The sidebar at about 4m20s in the video says that Guateng province has fully vaccinated 30% of its adult population.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aShg5mryzKuyPCur2/rapid-increase-of-highly-mutated-b-1-1-529-strain-in-south?commentId=yByrsE6Bkrn4NFYwT

SA health department is holding a press conference, starting now. Anyone can join via zoom.

https://​​sacoronavirus.co.za/​​2021/​​11/​​26/​​media-qa-session-on-covid-19-developments/​​